2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust adaptive beamforming under data dependent constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the adaptive approaches employed to combat mainbeam deceptive jamming in [6,8,9,11,12] are extremely susceptible to signal SV mismatches induced by observed direction error [14], array geometry error [15], channel gain and phase uncertainty [16], and incoherent local scattering [17]. Furthermore, when the training sample is contaminated by the desired signal, the aforementioned jamming suppression techniques will suffer performance degradation, resulting in the "self-cancellation" of the desired signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adaptive approaches employed to combat mainbeam deceptive jamming in [6,8,9,11,12] are extremely susceptible to signal SV mismatches induced by observed direction error [14], array geometry error [15], channel gain and phase uncertainty [16], and incoherent local scattering [17]. Furthermore, when the training sample is contaminated by the desired signal, the aforementioned jamming suppression techniques will suffer performance degradation, resulting in the "self-cancellation" of the desired signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new weighting design method is proposed in reference [34] to suppress the deceptive interference by using the range dimension degrees of freedom of the FDA to control the location distribution of the zero notches. However, the beamforming anti-jamming methods in [19,29,30,33,34] are easily affected by the signal mismatch caused by incoherent scattering [35], array error [36], direction error [37], and channel gain [38]. For non-uniformly spaced FDA radars, Ge [39] proposed a phase-centric cognitive adaptive anti-interference method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%