2008
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2008.929402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Adaptive Control of Feedback Linearizable MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Prescribed Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
1,176
1
39

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,915 publications
(1,217 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
1,176
1
39
Order By: Relevance
“…The unknown nonlinearity f V in equation (41) can be estimated by a LS-SVM-based approximator according to equation (22) …”
Section: Ls-svm-based Adaptive Controller Subject To Actuator Saturatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unknown nonlinearity f V in equation (41) can be estimated by a LS-SVM-based approximator according to equation (22) …”
Section: Ls-svm-based Adaptive Controller Subject To Actuator Saturatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. By comparison with traditional prescribed performance control approaches, 28,29 better transient performance guaranteeing small overshoot can be imposed on tracking errors based on a newly constructed prescribed performance mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predefined performance issue is an extremely challenging problem. Recently, adaptive neural prescribed performance controller was proposed in [43,44] for feedback linearizable nonlinear systems by means of transformation functions. The proposed method was also developed to deal with the constrained output tracking control problem in many applications such as robotic systems [45], nonlinear servo mechanisms [46], marine surface vessels [33], nonlinear stochastic large-scale systems with actuator faults [47], and switched nonlinear systems [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve partial tracking error constraints, a fuzzy dynamic surface control design was developed in [49,50] for a class of strict-feedback nonlinear systems by transforming the state tracking errors into new virtual variables. However, the existing control schemes, such as [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], can only guarantee the stability of closed-loop systems with different constraints, which are not capable of achieving the learning of unknown system dynamics. The main reason is that the derived closed-loop error system is extremely complex, such that its exponential convergence is difficult to be verified using the existing stability analysis tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%