2009 American Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2009.5159904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust adaptive optimal control modification with large adaptive gain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that parameter set INIT was chosen such that each scalar parameter was within an order of magnitude of the value to be identified. The choice of optimal adaptation gains is a long-standing open problem in adaptive systems theory [16], [17]. From simulations of the adaptive identification algorithm, we empirically chose angular velocity, inertia tensor, quadratic drag and buoyancy torque adaption gains of a = 10, γ 1 = 5000, γ 2 = 10000, and γ 3 = 1000 respectively.…”
Section: B Experimental Testing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that parameter set INIT was chosen such that each scalar parameter was within an order of magnitude of the value to be identified. The choice of optimal adaptation gains is a long-standing open problem in adaptive systems theory [16], [17]. From simulations of the adaptive identification algorithm, we empirically chose angular velocity, inertia tensor, quadratic drag and buoyancy torque adaption gains of a = 10, γ 1 = 5000, γ 2 = 10000, and γ 3 = 1000 respectively.…”
Section: B Experimental Testing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the results in adaptive control are derived from Lyapunov stability theory, such as parameter and indirect adaptive control schemes [6], [7]. The sensitivity of some adaptive schemes to disturbances and unmodeled dynamics 978-1-4244-6588-0/10/$25.00 ©201 0 IEEE prompted many researchers to investigate robust adaptive nonlinear control [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, updating laws with high learning rates may yield signals of high-frequency, which can, for example, excite unmodeled dynamics, and even result in instability for real-world applications. There have been great efforts on modifications of control architectures or updating laws for improving the transient performance of adaptive control systems [52][53][54]. However, most works are practiced within the model reference adaptive control framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%