2021
DOI: 10.1108/aeat-11-2020-0244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust adaptive preview control design for autonomous carrier landing of F/A-18 aircraft

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to design an innovative autonomous carrier landing system (ACLS) using novel robust adaptive preview control (RAPC) method, which can assure safe and successful autonomous carrier landing under the influence of airwake disturbance and irregular deck motion. To design a deck motion predictor based on an unscented Kalman filter (UKF), which predicts the touchdown point, very precisely. Design/methodology/approach An ACLS is comprising a UKF based deck motion predictor, a pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ĥ(s| θh ) = θT h ξ(s) (23) where ĥ(s| θh ) is the output of the fuzzy system, ξ(s) is the fuzzy vector, and the vector θT h varies in accordance with the adaptive laws. The optimal parameter is defined as…”
Section: Design Of Afsmftcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ĥ(s| θh ) = θT h ξ(s) (23) where ĥ(s| θh ) is the output of the fuzzy system, ξ(s) is the fuzzy vector, and the vector θT h varies in accordance with the adaptive laws. The optimal parameter is defined as…”
Section: Design Of Afsmftcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early landing control technology was mainly based on classical control [9][10][11], but that could not give CBA favourable landing performance in a complex landing environment. Therefore, scholars have provided many methods for improvement based on modern control theory, such as fixed-time control [12,13], dynamic inversion control [14], fuzzy control [15,16], predictive control [17,18], sliding-mode control [19,20], backstepping control [21] and adaptive control [22,23]. However, all the aforementioned studies were based on the hypothesis that CBA remains in their normal states without any faults, whereas in reality, they are susceptible to combat damage and actuator faults due to complex flight environments and large variations in dynamic pressure in operational missions, leading to serious degradation of system performance and posing direct threats to landing safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system's trajectory can also be improved using preview control, for example, by reducing energy use or increasing throughput. In general, using preview control can enhance the effectiveness and performance of DT systems in a variety of applications [25,26].…”
Section: 2motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cao et al (2021) presented the tracking controller of transition window based on robust preview control for aerospace vehicle. The robust preview control and adaptive control were combined to design the ACLS with consideration of irregular deck motion (Bhatia et al, 2021). However, there exists little literature on faulttolerant preview control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%