9th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (Isqed 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/isqed.2008.4479849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Analog Design for Automotive Applications by Design Centering with Safe Operating Areas

Abstract: The effects of random variations during the manufacturing process on devices can be simulated as a variation of transistor parameters. Device degradation, due to temperature or voltage stress, causes a shift of device parameters, for example threshold voltage V th , which can also be modeled as a degradation of transistor parameters. Therefore, in order to design circuits, which are robust and reliable, analysis and optimization of their sensitivity to variations in model parameters is important. Furthermore, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the process variation as second order effects on the sensitivity towards degradation, C(t) is assumed to be constant, i.e., C(t)=C (Sobe et al, 2009). …”
Section: Linear Performance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking the process variation as second order effects on the sensitivity towards degradation, C(t) is assumed to be constant, i.e., C(t)=C (Sobe et al, 2009). …”
Section: Linear Performance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which differs from (5) in (Sobe et al, 2009). From (37) it is clear that the evaluation of the worst-case distance degradation rate for a performance upper bound involves only multiple sensitivity evaluations which can be carried out efficiently.…”
Section: Linear Performance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can model robustness across all levels of abstraction from transistor to system level, both in the analog and digital domain. This broad applicability is the main difference compared to other approaches to measure robustness in fields like computer science [Higham 1996;Eslamnour and Ali 2009], automotive electronics [SAE 2008], or analog circuits [Sobe et al 2008] and underlines its cross-layer capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the robust ness of numerical algorithms [2] or the use of the term in control theory [3] or temporal logic [4]. Also, the robust ness of workstation clusters [5] and even of analog circuits [6] have been discussed before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%