2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78499-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Analysis of Timed Automata Via Channel Machines

Abstract: Abstract. Whereas formal verification of timed systems has become a very active field of research, the idealised mathematical semantics of timed automata cannot be faithfully implemented. Several works have thus focused on a modified semantics of timed automata which ensures implementability, and robust model-checking algorithms for safety, and later LTL properties have been designed. Recently, a new approach has been proposed, which reduces (standard) model-checking of timed automata to other verification pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the greatest constant in is now multiplied by 1 0 and the regions of 0 can still be encoded in polynomial space. The problem is PSPACE-hard since it is already for timed automata with progress cycles [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the greatest constant in is now multiplied by 1 0 and the regions of 0 can still be encoded in polynomial space. The problem is PSPACE-hard since it is already for timed automata with progress cycles [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simpler over-approximation, the so-called enlarged semantics was also studied, which models the imprecisions by relaxing all clock constraints of the automaton of the form ∈ [ , ] to ∈ [ − , + ] for some > 0. The problem of robust model-checking, that is determining whether for some > 0, the enlarged semantics satisfies a given property, was first solved for safety properties [14,8], then for linear temporal logic (LTL) [4] (both in PSPACE, which is the complexity of the problem in the exact semantics), and for a timed extension of LTL [5]. These robust model-checking algorithms are all valid for a particular class of timed automata, namely, those in which all cycles are progress cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An important problem is then to determine whether a given timed automaton is implementable, that is, whether its implementation is correct with respect to a given property, in a fast enough hardware. For this purpose, robust model-checking, which asks for the existence of a parameter ∆ under which the resulting enlarged semantics is correct, was proven decidable for safety properties [15,11] and for richer lineartime properties [8,9]. If robust model-checking succeeds, then the given timed automaton is implementable in a fast enough hardware in the sense of [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%