2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3049308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Efficient Classification for Underground Metal Target Using Dimensionality Reduction and Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two matrixes were created to observe the correlation between input variables: one based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (Wan et al, 2021 ) and one on the Spearman correlation coefficient (Ghosh et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two matrixes were created to observe the correlation between input variables: one based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (Wan et al, 2021 ) and one on the Spearman correlation coefficient (Ghosh et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning algorithms and electromagnetic pulses including a two-sided decaying exponential, Gaussian, triangular, raised cosine, rectangular, and rectangular chirp, were used to classify metallic objects [83]. Thirty-three classification strategies based on eleven dimensionality reduction methods were used on simulated data of the time domain decay of metallic ellipsoids nearby an EMI system [84]. Accuracy of 99% for material-based and shape-based classification was achieved.…”
Section: Machine Learning Classification Of Metallic Objects Using Em...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of metallic objects was estimated using a pulse induction metal detector and a 1D CNN [53]. Simulated data of the time domain decay of metallic ellipsoids using an orthogonal dipole model nearby an EMI system were classified using machine learning techniques [61]. Thirty-three classification strategies based on eleven dimensionality reduction methods were investigated, including artificial neural networks, with the best classification achieving 99% accuracy for material-based and shape-based classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%