2021
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and flexible inference for the covariate‐specific receiver operating characteristic curve

Abstract: Diagnostic tests are of critical importance in health care and medical research. Motivated by the impact that atypical and outlying test outcomes might have on the assessment of the discriminatory ability of a diagnostic test, we develop a robust and flexible model for conducting inference about the covariate‐specific receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve that safeguards against outlying test results while also accommodating for possible nonlinear effects of the covariates. Specifically, we postulate a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has focused on extending statistical methodology for ROC curve estimation to address issues such as adjustment for covariates, 3 , 4 incorporating censoring due to instrument detection limits 5 , 6 and robustness to model misspecification. 7 In addition, a wide variety of parametric and nonparametric methods have been proposed within frequentist and Bayesian paradigms (see Inácio et al 8 for a recent review). However, there is no consensus on an analytic approach that can handle all these issues simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has focused on extending statistical methodology for ROC curve estimation to address issues such as adjustment for covariates, 3 , 4 incorporating censoring due to instrument detection limits 5 , 6 and robustness to model misspecification. 7 In addition, a wide variety of parametric and nonparametric methods have been proposed within frequentist and Bayesian paradigms (see Inácio et al 8 for a recent review). However, there is no consensus on an analytic approach that can handle all these issues simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has focused on extending statistical methodology for ROC curve estimation to address issues such as adjustment for covariates (Pepe 1997(Pepe , 1998(Pepe , 2000Faraggi 2003), incorporating censoring due to instrument detection limits (Perkins et al 2007;Ruopp et al 2008;Bantis et al 2017), comparing correlated diagnostic tests (Hanley and McNeil 1983;DeLong et al 1988;Zou and Hall 2002;Molodianovitch et al 2006;Bantis and Feng 2016) and robustness to model misspecification (Bianco et al 2020;Inácio et al 2021a). In addition, a wide variety of parametric and nonparametric methods have been proposed within frequentist and Bayesian paradigms (Hsieh and Turnbull 1996;Alonzo and Pepe 2002;Erkanli et al 2006;Branscum et al 2008;Yao et al 2010;González-Manteiga et al 2011;Rodríguez-Álvarez et al 2011;Cai and Pepe 2002;Cai and Moskowitz 2004;Inácio et al 2013;Ghosal et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%