2010 8th International Conference on Communications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccomm.2010.5509116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust automatic transcription of English speech corpora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DARPA Robust Automatic Transcription of Speech (RATS) corpus is comprised of a large amount of primarily telephony audio from various languages degraded by transmitting the audio through 8 different radio transmission conditions. Further details about the corpus and channel conditions used can be found in Kabir et al (0000) . The corpus contains speech in Arabic, Farsi, Dari, Urdu, and Pashtu.…”
Section: Corpora Evaluation and Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DARPA Robust Automatic Transcription of Speech (RATS) corpus is comprised of a large amount of primarily telephony audio from various languages degraded by transmitting the audio through 8 different radio transmission conditions. Further details about the corpus and channel conditions used can be found in Kabir et al (0000) . The corpus contains speech in Arabic, Farsi, Dari, Urdu, and Pashtu.…”
Section: Corpora Evaluation and Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labels were taken from the clean sets when possible to ensure they convey the spoken message; for Aurora 4 using the given clean close-microphone condition; for CHiME 3, as there are no available clean labels, we used the ones produced by the force-alignment from the best performing setup; the CHiME 2 clean labels were used from forced alignment system detailed in (Kabir et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discriminability Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"bin blue at f two now"). Phonetic transcriptions were automatically generated using a Viterbi forced alignment procedure [12].…”
Section: Experimental Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%