2017
DOI: 10.3390/app7100989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Background Subtraction via the Local Similarity Statistical Descriptor

Abstract: Abstract:Background subtraction based on change detection is the first step in many computer vision systems. Many background subtraction methods have been proposed to detect foreground objects through background modeling. However, most of these methods are pixel-based, which only use pixel-by-pixel comparisons, and a few others are spatial-based, which take the neighborhood of each analyzed pixel into consideration. In this paper, inspired by a illumination-invariant feature based on locality-sensitive histogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, all the compared models were reconstructed with a sample consensus scheme without pattern kernel density estimation or histogram approach. The ALMT feature of our model was replaced by LBP [22], LTP [26], SILTP [27], LBSP [30], LLSD [40], IIF [20] and ALTF [31] features to build corresponding LBP model (LBPM) , LTP model (LTPM), SILTP model (SILTPM), LBSP model (LBSPM), LLSD model(LLSDM), IIF model (IIFM) and ALTF model (ALTFM), respectively. Moreover, all the parameters of features in the compared methods were set to the optimum values according to the original authors' recommendations and the other parameters of consensus scheme method were set to the same value as in our model.…”
Section: Experiments a Experimental Datasets And Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, all the compared models were reconstructed with a sample consensus scheme without pattern kernel density estimation or histogram approach. The ALMT feature of our model was replaced by LBP [22], LTP [26], SILTP [27], LBSP [30], LLSD [40], IIF [20] and ALTF [31] features to build corresponding LBP model (LBPM) , LTP model (LTPM), SILTP model (SILTPM), LBSP model (LBSPM), LLSD model(LLSDM), IIF model (IIFM) and ALTF model (ALTFM), respectively. Moreover, all the parameters of features in the compared methods were set to the optimum values according to the original authors' recommendations and the other parameters of consensus scheme method were set to the same value as in our model.…”
Section: Experiments a Experimental Datasets And Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction and selection enable representation of the information present in the image, and limit the number of features, thus allowing further analysis within a reasonable time. Feature extraction was used in a wide range of applications, such as biometrics [12,14,15], classification of cloth, surfaces, landscapes, wood, and rock minerals [16,17], saliency detection [18], and background subtraction [19], among others. During the past 40 years, while a substantial number of methods for grayscale texture classification were developed [3,5], there was also a growing interest in colored textures [1,2,9,10,13,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%