2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust boundary treatment for open-channel flows in divergence-free incompressible SPH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common is for each point to move with its own velocity ∆ x i = v (n) i ∆t , ∀i. Some variants of SPH use movement with the average velocity in the neighbourhood of each particle [19], while others perform two first order movements per time-step: one based on an 'intermediate' velocity, and one based on a 'final' velocity [23]. Some meshfree methods use the average velocity of the current and the previous time step [25], and even refer to the same as a second order method.…”
Section: First Order Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common is for each point to move with its own velocity ∆ x i = v (n) i ∆t , ∀i. Some variants of SPH use movement with the average velocity in the neighbourhood of each particle [19], while others perform two first order movements per time-step: one based on an 'intermediate' velocity, and one based on a 'final' velocity [23]. Some meshfree methods use the average velocity of the current and the previous time step [25], and even refer to the same as a second order method.…”
Section: First Order Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving boundary points along this direction will result in the disc to constantly increase in volume. Despite the significant inaccuracies due to this method of movement, it is still used extensively today in almost all Lagrangian meshfree methods (see, for example, recent work in [18,23,25,29]).…”
Section: First Order Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to consider incompressibility in the SPH formulation, two approaches based on the projection method introduced by Chorin 74 in 1968 were proposed. 13,18 In 1999, Cummins and Rudman 75 have imposed a divergence free velocity field in the projection method. In 2003, Shao and Lo 17 have imposed an invariance of the fluid density in the projection method.…”
Section: Projection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SPH method was called weakly compressible SPH (WCSPH) method because the weak form of the density transport equation is enforced through a state equation for pressure based on a numerical speed of sound. [10][11][12][13] The main disadvantage of the WCSPH method is the requirement of small time steps to avoid some numerical errors in the estimation of pressure with the state equation. [13][14][15] To overcome this difficulty, the incompressible SPH (ISPH) methods have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation