2008
DOI: 10.1109/tcad.2008.925776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Clock Tree Routing in the Presence of Process Variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the ∆ delay (Y rcw ) or ∆ delay (Y cw ) becomes larger than the corresponding A rcw or A cw , we can use TBC, which will reduce the delay variation and improve WNS. Alternatively, we can also intentionally route the wires over multiple layers during the physical implementation stages so as to create critical paths which has less BEOL variations as already discussed in [17] [19].…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the ∆ delay (Y rcw ) or ∆ delay (Y cw ) becomes larger than the corresponding A rcw or A cw , we can use TBC, which will reduce the delay variation and improve WNS. Alternatively, we can also intentionally route the wires over multiple layers during the physical implementation stages so as to create critical paths which has less BEOL variations as already discussed in [17] [19].…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We scan in 5 (=4 + 1) to the delay value of ADB ref for one testing flow. Then, in the subsequent two testing flows, we scan in 6 unless the value has reached Max syn (Min syn ). Otherwise, the corresponding synchronizer is deemed to be faulty.…”
Section: A Scan-chain Architecture and The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various works have proposed clock network structures in order to mitigate or tolerate the clock-skew variation. The structures are roughly classified into a variation-aware clock tree structure (e.g., Wason et al [2007] and Padmanabhan et al [2008]), a non-tree structure by inserting links (e.g., Rajaram et al [2006], Yang et al [2007], and Lam et al [2005]) and clock mesh network (e.g., Restle et al [2001], Cho et al [2010], Guthaus et al [2012], Venkataraman et al [2010], Rajaram and Pan [2010], Chakrabarti et al [2012], and Lu et al [2012]). Among the structures, the clock mesh network offers the highest tolerance to the delay variation since the mesh grid contains multiple paths from the clock source to every clock sink, thus the delay variation in a path is compensated by the delay of another path(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%