2016 American Control Conference (ACC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2016.7526124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust compensation of electromechanical delay during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of antagonistic muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of the muscle response to electrical stimulation are available and could be incorporated as a feedforward element to the existing controller to ensure muscle contraction resulting from FES occurs in a similar time range as the robotic torque assistance for the motion to be produced [48]- [51]. Recent works have also targeted the development of controllers to reduce the effect of the electromechanical delay of the stimulation [52], [53], which would lead to a better alignment of the motion resulting from the two actuation systems. However, these approaches for delay compensation are not considering the time-varying nature of the electromechanical delay [43], and are applied to cyclic gait motion or to the tracking of predetermined trajectories, hence they would not be suitable for this pseudo-random tracking task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of the muscle response to electrical stimulation are available and could be incorporated as a feedforward element to the existing controller to ensure muscle contraction resulting from FES occurs in a similar time range as the robotic torque assistance for the motion to be produced [48]- [51]. Recent works have also targeted the development of controllers to reduce the effect of the electromechanical delay of the stimulation [52], [53], which would lead to a better alignment of the motion resulting from the two actuation systems. However, these approaches for delay compensation are not considering the time-varying nature of the electromechanical delay [43], and are applied to cyclic gait motion or to the tracking of predetermined trajectories, hence they would not be suitable for this pseudo-random tracking task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two aforementioned approaches were implemented on several practical systems. In (Sharma, Gregory, & Dixon, 2011;Qiu, Alibeji, & Sharma, 2016), the robust predictive controllers were applied to neuromuscular rehabilitation systems, and a similar delay compensation technique was further designed for musculoskeletal wearable systems (Alibeji, Dicianno, & Sharma, 2017;Alibeji, Kirsch, & Sharma, 2017;Sheng, Sun, Molazadeh, & Sharma, 2021). The second method (62)-( 63) handled the accurate grasp-place control of a 7-DoF Baxter manipulator (Bagheri et al, 2018(Bagheri et al, , 2019b(Bagheri et al, , 2019b.…”
Section: Predictor-based Control For Mechanical/robotic Euler-lagrang...mentioning
confidence: 99%