2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-018-9812-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust connectivity maintenance for fallible robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective function increases, which corresponds to the simulated behavior (compare to Figure 2). The initial decrease in coverage, as well as the increasing of connectivity have been observed in the previous experiments [11]. Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Validationsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective function increases, which corresponds to the simulated behavior (compare to Figure 2). The initial decrease in coverage, as well as the increasing of connectivity have been observed in the previous experiments [11]. Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Validationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These gain combinations determine the overall performance of the system. To automate the choice of the overall parameter set (i.e., the control law gains), we introduce an offline optimization method [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transitioning from simulation to real robots can be challenging and results in performance degradation, especially with resource constraint hardware [11]. To demonstrate the portability of the proposed online optimization, and to analyze how hardware limitations affect the choice of the optimization parameters (i.e., the generated points G p and optimization period O p ), we used an actual distributed multi-robot system to test our methodology.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], we showed that the selection of these control gains can be delegated to autonomous, online optimization. Yet, we did not investigate the interplay of this level of autonomy with the error models in [11], in this work, we finally fill the gap. We do so by carrying the control and algorithms presented in [12] into the real robotic setup of [11]including two types of fault-injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation