2011
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2010.2064168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Control With Exact Uncertainties Compensation: With or Without Chattering?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motor induces a torque = = , where u is the normalized input voltage of the PWM amplifier, is constant, and = . There are two control problems commonly associated with the Furuta pendulum: stabilization around one of the two equilibrium points and the swing-up [48,49]. In order to study the inherent delay due to the wireless communication together with the design of a retarded control law, here we are going to focus on the problem of stabilization.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motor induces a torque = = , where u is the normalized input voltage of the PWM amplifier, is constant, and = . There are two control problems commonly associated with the Furuta pendulum: stabilization around one of the two equilibrium points and the swing-up [48,49]. In order to study the inherent delay due to the wireless communication together with the design of a retarded control law, here we are going to focus on the problem of stabilization.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using classical techniques, stabilization of the Furuta pendulum requires measurements of variables and and the estimation of the corresponding time derivativeṡanḋ(see, e.g., [33,48,49]). However, when wireless communication is considered, delays in the measurement deteriorate the accuracy of estimation of time derivatives.…”
Section: Controller Design and Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…within finite time. As reported by Ferreira et al [4] a control goal may be effectively achieved by one of the following two approaches: The first one aims to design an sliding mode controller. In this case the perturbations are rejected by means of the robust controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such uncertainties may be due to measurement error, simplified models of natural laws, neglected dynamics, or inevitably uncertain model. In recent years, a variety of methodologies in robust control have been studied and proposed, such as adaptive control approach, differential inequality approach, sliding mode control approach, ∞ control approach, adaptive sliding mode control approach, time-domain approach, backstepping control approach, neural-fuzzy approach, LMI approach, and others; see, for instance [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and the references therein. In [8], based on the time-domain approach with differential inequality, a feedback control has been proposed to accomplish generalized exponential synchronization for a pair of mechanical systems with uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%