2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust coordinated control of a dual-arm space robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To control multi-arm space robots in coordination with the spacecraft base, several schemes have been proposed, such as a model-based control algorithm ( Moosavian and Papadopoulos, 1997 ), and an adaptation of the AVSC ( Shi et al, 2017 ). The use of a second arm as a balancing mechanism, while the primary manipulator performs the desired task, was studied in Xu et al (2017) .…”
Section: Feedback Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control multi-arm space robots in coordination with the spacecraft base, several schemes have been proposed, such as a model-based control algorithm ( Moosavian and Papadopoulos, 1997 ), and an adaptation of the AVSC ( Shi et al, 2017 ). The use of a second arm as a balancing mechanism, while the primary manipulator performs the desired task, was studied in Xu et al (2017) .…”
Section: Feedback Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sliding mode control (SMC), which has many variants including the fast terminal sliding mode (FTSM) [37][38][39], the super-twisting sliding mode [40][41] and integral sliding mode (ISM) [42], is robust to system uncertainties and unknown disturbances. Therefore, SMC can deal with the bounded estimation errors of various estimation techniques including TDE, neural networks, and the FLA. To achieve the asymptotic stability under the presence of bounded estimation errors, many SMC schemes require either a monotonically increasing switching gain [43][44][45] or a conservative constant switching gain that is greater than the known upper bound of estimation errors [46][47][48]. However, over-estimating the switching gains will invariably lead to chattering effects, which will decrease the tracking accuracy and require the use of large actuator inputs (thus wasting fuel).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the sliding variables will leave the sliding manifold if the switching gains are too small to handle TDE errors, so tracking accuracy is, once again, badly affected. Thus, to achieve the chattering reduction while retaining a good tracking accuracy, the SMC scheme needs to maintain the advantage of existing controllers [43][44][45][46][47][48] (reduction of chattering effects by decreasing switching gain without loss of stability) while preventing the sliding variables from leaving the manifold when the switching gains are small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinated attitude control scheme 4 has been demonstrated in the project Engineering Test Satellite VII (ETS-VII). 5 Variety of control techniques have been developed for space robot coordinated control systems, including variable structure control methods, [6][7][8][9] adaptive control approaches, [10][11][12][13] optimal control strategies, [14][15][16][17] neural network, 18,19 and extended state observer. 20 It should be pointed out that the manipulator motion 10,14 yields no platform attitude disturbance, which is based on the reaction null space (RNS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%