2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-5606-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust corner detection using altitude to chord ratio accumulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for contours or boundaries, the curvature extreme points or the intersection points of two line contours are usually considered as corners [4]. Generally, there exists three categories of approaches for corner detection in the current literatures [5]: Model-based algorithms [6][7][8], intensity-based algorithms [9][10][11][12][13], contour-based algorithms [4,5,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Compared with another two types of methods, contour-based algorithms show good characteristics considering their low rate of detection error [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As for contours or boundaries, the curvature extreme points or the intersection points of two line contours are usually considered as corners [4]. Generally, there exists three categories of approaches for corner detection in the current literatures [5]: Model-based algorithms [6][7][8], intensity-based algorithms [9][10][11][12][13], contour-based algorithms [4,5,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Compared with another two types of methods, contour-based algorithms show good characteristics considering their low rate of detection error [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for contour‐based corner detection algorithms, corner response function (CRF) at each pixel point on the contour is calculated to reflect the sharpness of the curve changes at that position. Accurately measuring the CRF is the key step for contour‐based corner detectors, since it directly affects the performance and computational complexity [14]. Mokhtarian first proposes employing the curvature scale‐space (CSS) [15] technology for corner detection which has become the landmark method in this filed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome the above‐mentioned problems, Awrangjeb and Lu [23] proposed a corner detection technique named chord‐to‐point distance accumulation (CPDA), which they improved to a faster version, F‐CPDA [24]. Nevertheless, both have some drawbacks, so several corner detectors, such as chord to triangular arms ratio (CTAR) [31] and altitude‐to‐chord ratio accumulation (ACRA) [32], have been proposed to overcome their weaknesses. Meanwhile, many state‐of‐the‐art‐ and contour‐based corner detectors have been proposed, including laplacian of gaussian (LoG) [33], weighted eigenvector‐based angle estimator (WEAE) [34] and second‐order difference of contour (SODC) [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the curvature values estimated of CPDA technique to measure the sharpness of the corners may not be proportional to the angle of the corners [23] and meanwhile some weak corners would be missed due to the larger radius of the RoS. To address this issue in CPDA, Teng et al [23] proposed to utilize simple triangular theory and distance calculation for effective and efficient corner detection (CTAR) and Lin et al [28] proposed to use the altitude-to-chord ratio accumulation (ACRA) as the curvature significance. In recent years, many other impressive contourbased corner detectors have also been proposed [21]- [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%