2020
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2018.2884316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Deadlock Prevention for Automated Manufacturing Systems With Unreliable Resources by Using General Petri Nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of these differences, the idea of robustness and robust control objectives in these studies are completely different from those in this paper. For robust deadlock control in [37]- [40], [42], [43], [45], [46], [49], there must exist more than one type of an unreliable resource, while in this study, failure of an unreliable does not effect the processing of part types that do not require the failed resource. To avoid repetition here, readers can refer to [50] for more details about the performance analysis and comparison of these robust deadlock control policies [25]- [37], [40], [43]- [45], [47]- [49] and other policies not mentioned in this study.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of these differences, the idea of robustness and robust control objectives in these studies are completely different from those in this paper. For robust deadlock control in [37]- [40], [42], [43], [45], [46], [49], there must exist more than one type of an unreliable resource, while in this study, failure of an unreliable does not effect the processing of part types that do not require the failed resource. To avoid repetition here, readers can refer to [50] for more details about the performance analysis and comparison of these robust deadlock control policies [25]- [37], [40], [43]- [45], [47]- [49] and other policies not mentioned in this study.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, the types of AMSs considered in this work are different from the ones considered in [37]- [40], [42], [43], [45], [49]. In [37]- [40], [42], [43], [45], [46], [49] a resource type consists of robots and machines without buffer spaces, while in this work a resource type is a workstation composed of buffer spaces that accommodate and hold part types, and a server or processor that processes parts occupying the buffer spaces. Second, a resource failure in this work means the failure of a This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility of each solution must be examined and the infeasible ones are repaired. There are some works addressing the deadlock problem of FMSs [32][33][34][35][36], and deadlock-free operations of FMSs can thus be guaranteed. In this work, an Amending Algorithm proposed by [17] is used to obtain a feasible sequence of transitions from M 0 to M f .…”
Section: Representation Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A resource failure can produce new deadlocks in a controlled net, leading to severe loss before the failure is recovered [27], [30], [31]. Therefore, we should devise a robust deadlock approach to keep the liveness property and maintain a continuous production flow for a system even if there are unreliable resources [31], [33], [37]- [42], [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust deadlock control methods in [42] and [47] are also designed for generalized PNs with unreliable resources. In [42], an ES 3 PR (extend S 3 PR) model with a single type of unreliable resources is used. It should be noticed that GS 3 PRs are not a proper subclass of ES 3 PRs and vice versa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%