1970
DOI: 10.37936/ecti-cit.201371.54355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Digital Control for an LLC Current-Resonant DC-DC Converter

Abstract: If a pulse frequency and a load resistance of an LLC current-resonant DC-DC converter are changed, the dynamic characteristics are varied greatly, that is, the LLC current-resonant DC-DC converter has non-linear characteristics. In many applications of DC-DC converters, loads cannot be specified in advance, and they will be changed suddenly from no loads to full loads. A DC-DC converter system used a conventional single controller cannot be adapted to change dynamics and it occurs large output voltage variatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspecting (22), it is noticed that e 1 depends of θ θ θ and θ θ θ * . Where θ θ θ origin is in the APDR control action, andθ θ θ * is related to the periodic disturbance d. From the APDR subsystem point of view, it is assumed that there is a correct solution called θ θ θ * for the adapted θ θ θ that reject the disturbance d and brings e 1 to zero.…”
Section: Tracking Error Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspecting (22), it is noticed that e 1 depends of θ θ θ and θ θ θ * . Where θ θ θ origin is in the APDR control action, andθ θ θ * is related to the periodic disturbance d. From the APDR subsystem point of view, it is assumed that there is a correct solution called θ θ θ * for the adapted θ θ θ that reject the disturbance d and brings e 1 to zero.…”
Section: Tracking Error Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcame small-signal model limitations, nonlinear controllers have been proposed in the literature presenting strong robustness against disturbances, parameters uncertainties, parametric variation, unmodelled dynamics, and load variations. Specifically, to control the DC/DC LLC converter, sliding-mode control is proposed in [20], bang-bang control in [21], robust control in [22], model reference adaptive control (MRAC) in [23], and optimal trajectory control in [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] classic PI controller has been implemented digitally for UPS charger based on placing the controller zero near the dominant pole of converter transfer function. Also in some other literature, nonlinear control methods have been proposed, such as predictive control [23], sliding-mode control [24][25][26], bang-bang control [27,28], robust control [29][30][31], and different digital controller [32][33][34][35], all are not applicable to low cost SMPS products because of their more implementation costs and complexity. Therefore in the industrial view, they are not a good candidate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still difficult to achieve perfect control performance against a wide-range variation of load conditions by using these linear control methods. Although some non-linear control methods are proposed to improve the control performance, such as sliding-mode control [29], bang-bang control [30], robust control [31], self-adaptive fuzzy control [32] etc., implementations are difficult due to their complexity. The authors of [33][34][35] proposed optimal trajectory control methods through combining a proportional-integral (PI) controller with an optimal trajectory controller to achieve good steady and dynamic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%