2020 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/irc.2020.00061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Distance Estimation of Capacitive Proximity Sensors in HRI using Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction errors for distance and angle are in line with other studies. For the distance prediction, the approach of Poeppel et al [9] has been outperformed for distances with less than 200 mm. They reported an average error of 20.7 mm with a detection range of 350 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prediction errors for distance and angle are in line with other studies. For the distance prediction, the approach of Poeppel et al [9] has been outperformed for distances with less than 200 mm. They reported an average error of 20.7 mm with a detection range of 350 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoffmann et al [8] developed an environment-aware capacitive sensor and used a nearest neighbor search to estimate the distance to obstacles based on an environment model. Poeppel et al [9] used a neural network to compensate external influences on capacitive sensors for robust distance estimation. Erickson et al [10] used a neural network to estimate the relative position and pitch and yaw from a series of capacitive sensor readings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [25], a detection distance of about 30 cm for electrodes of size between 50 × 50 mm 2 and 100×100 mm 2 is reported for HRI (AT-I). Finally, as the sensing range increases, self-influence becomes an issue that needs to be addressed [11], [50].…”
Section: A Capacitive Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is impractical due to 1) the high cost of ToF sensors such as lidar or millimeter wave radar, and 2) large numbers of of ToF sensors emitting at the same time will interfere with each other, which complicates system design. Finally, other type of sensing modalities such as infrared sensors [3] or capacitive coupling sensors [10] which leverage signal interference patterns have been proposed for on-robot collision avoidance. However, these sensors are orientation-dependent, and capacitive sensing only works on obstacles that have purposely calibrated dielectric constants, such as water or human tissues.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%