2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2021
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco47968.2020.9287433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Drone Detection for Acoustic Monitoring Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[125] A database comprising 7001 drone flight observations and 3818 noise recording observations in a regulated setting where signals are played 1 at a time was created and each observation consisted of a 0.2 s signal sequence. [126] UFive different drone models are included in the training materials: the ALIGN M690L Multi-Drone, the SKY-HERO Little Spyder, the DJI Phantom4, the DJI Mavic, and a custom-built racing drone. Several UAV types that were absent from training dataset recordings are included in the testing material (DJI F450, Unique Taifun H520).…”
Section: Reference Datasets Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[125] A database comprising 7001 drone flight observations and 3818 noise recording observations in a regulated setting where signals are played 1 at a time was created and each observation consisted of a 0.2 s signal sequence. [126] UFive different drone models are included in the training materials: the ALIGN M690L Multi-Drone, the SKY-HERO Little Spyder, the DJI Phantom4, the DJI Mavic, and a custom-built racing drone. Several UAV types that were absent from training dataset recordings are included in the testing material (DJI F450, Unique Taifun H520).…”
Section: Reference Datasets Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many research works have been published to address UAV detection, tracking, and classification problems. The main drone detection technologies are: radar sensors [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], RF sensors [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], audio sensors [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ], and camera sensors using visual UAV characteristics [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. Based on the above-mentioned sources, the advantages and disadvantages of each drone detection technology are compared in Table 2 .…”
Section: Drone Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the sound produced by propeller blades is frequently employed for detection because it has a comparatively larger amplitude. Numerous research works have examined the sound produced by drones, using characteristics like frequency, amplitude, modulation, and duration to identify a drone’s existence [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Drone Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once obtained, the MFCC or spectragram feature set can be used to train Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) models [24], or Convolution type models such as CNNs [31]- [36], Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) [32]- [34] which incorporate temporal dependence and Convolutional-RNNs (CRNNs) [33], [34]. The feature set can also be used to train vector type models including, Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [27], [28], [30], [35], Gaussian Mixture Models [32] and KNNs [37] or, retrain existing models such as random forests [38], ResNet [25] and LeNet [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%