Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference 1987
DOI: 10.2514/6.1987-2252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust eigensystem assignment for flexible structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kautsky et al [3] showed that the assigned poles were as insensitive as possible to perturbation of the gains and system matrix terms when the closed-loop eigenvectors were made to be as close to orthogonal as possible. Juang et al [4] used QR decomposition (equivalently singular value decomposition) to make the closed-loop eigenvalues as well conditioned as possible, thereby extending the work of Kautsky et al [3]. Juang and Maghami [5] considered the second-order matrix pencil and assigned the poles of the system robustly, so the closed-loop eigenvectors were chosen to be as close as possible to a well-conditioned matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kautsky et al [3] showed that the assigned poles were as insensitive as possible to perturbation of the gains and system matrix terms when the closed-loop eigenvectors were made to be as close to orthogonal as possible. Juang et al [4] used QR decomposition (equivalently singular value decomposition) to make the closed-loop eigenvalues as well conditioned as possible, thereby extending the work of Kautsky et al [3]. Juang and Maghami [5] considered the second-order matrix pencil and assigned the poles of the system robustly, so the closed-loop eigenvectors were chosen to be as close as possible to a well-conditioned matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One strategy for attitude control of flexible spacecraft is to stabilize the platform in the inertial frame while redirecting the flexible appendage-for instance, an antenna-with respect to the stationary platform to coincide with the lines of sight. To do this, many linear and nonlinear control techniques have been proposed such as disturbance accommodating control [1], PI control [2], linear optimal control (LQR) [1,3], output feedback [4], eigensystem assignment [5], and model reference adaptive control [6,7]. Although most of these controllers show promising results, this paper presents the framework for another type of nonlinear controller which is easy to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a special case of (1), second-order descriptor linear systems have been applied in many fields, such as vibration and structural analysis, spacecraft control and robot control, hence have attracted much attention of research [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]11,[13][14][15][16][17]20]. Concerning the control of second-order linear systems, most of results concern stabilization [6,17,20], pole assignment [2][3][4]6,14] and eigenstructure (i) i order derivative of x d e tracking error vector e (i) i …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the control of second-order linear systems, most of results concern stabilization [6,17,20], pole assignment [2][3][4]6,14] and eigenstructure (i) i order derivative of x d e tracking error vector e (i) i …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%