2014
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2013.2265135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Electromagnetic Control of Microrobots Under Force and Localization Uncertainties

Abstract: Abstract-Microrobots are promising tools for micromanipulation and minimally invasive interventions. Robust electromagnetic control of microrobots can be achieved through precisely modeled magnetic steering systems and accurate localization. Error-free modeling and position information, however, are not realistic assumptions, and microrobots need to be controlled under force and localization uncertainties. In this paper, methods to account for these types of uncertainties are presented. Initially, the uncertai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [19], the authors used H ∞ control to achieve 3D motion control for a magnetic body actuated with magnetic field gradients. This approach assumes linear drag forces in low Reynolds number fluid regimes and a fully-actuated system and is therefore not applicable to nonholonomic microrobots.…”
Section: B Motion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], the authors used H ∞ control to achieve 3D motion control for a magnetic body actuated with magnetic field gradients. This approach assumes linear drag forces in low Reynolds number fluid regimes and a fully-actuated system and is therefore not applicable to nonholonomic microrobots.…”
Section: B Motion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14] Marino et al compare an H∞ controller with a PID controller for a linear uncertain dynamical model for electromagnetic steering control of a 1000 μm microrobot in low viscosity oil using the OctoMag system [15]. Tracking errors on the order of 270-490 μm are reported using the H∞ controller.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, closed-loop control can deal with these perturbations effectively. For microrobotic systems, different closed-loop techniques such as linear control [5], adaptive control [9], H ∞ control [10] and model predictive control [11] have been investigated. For (standard) linear controllers, problems such as instabilities and undesired oscillations have been reported [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%