2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2875932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Energy Calibration Technique for Photon Counting Spectral Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, DE image contrast may be inferior using this approach since the mean energy separation between the two images is small 79–81 . More recently, there has been interest in the use of photon counting detectors to provide spectral separation which may be used to remove overlaying bone on kV‐projections 82–86 . Furthermore, machine learning approaches, especially deep learning approaches, have been applied to segment kV‐projections 87–92 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, DE image contrast may be inferior using this approach since the mean energy separation between the two images is small 79–81 . More recently, there has been interest in the use of photon counting detectors to provide spectral separation which may be used to remove overlaying bone on kV‐projections 82–86 . Furthermore, machine learning approaches, especially deep learning approaches, have been applied to segment kV‐projections 87–92 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[79][80][81] More recently, there has been interest in the use of photon counting detectors to provide spectral separation which may be used to remove overlaying bone on kV-projections. [82][83][84][85][86] Furthermore, machine learning approaches, especially deep learning approaches, have been applied to segment kVprojections. [87][88][89][90][91][92]…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes an electronic discriminator to exclude photons above a given threshold energy value selected by the experimenter. Using efficient energy-calibration methods, the experimenter can accurately link these electronic thresholds to the corresponding photon energy [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quadratic energy calibration was performed for the energy thresholds using the 59.5 keV gamma emission from americium-241, the 122 keV gamma emission from cobalt-57 and using the DIR method for energies of 40 keV to 80 keV. 6 With this calibration, the low energy threshold used to suppress electronic noise was set at 17 keV while the HE threshold was set to 32 keV and was incremented by steps of approximately 6.5 keV to approximately 90% of the maximum energy of the beam (E max ). For each HE threshold and tube voltage combination, ten LE and HE images were taken using the high-sensitivity anti-coincidence mode on the PCD, which implements a charge sharing correction on the images.…”
Section: Imaging Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%