2015
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2015.2469895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Equalization of Mobile Underwater Acoustic Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under CSI uncertainty, the Viterbi algorithm implements Algorithm 1 with the loglikelihoods computed using the noisy channel estimate, while ViterbiNet is trained using samples taken from different realizations of the noisy h(γ). [41], underwater acoustic channels [42], and impulsive noise channels [43]. In particular, we simulate an alphastable noise with stability parameter α = 0.5, skewness parameter β = 0.75, scale parameter c = 1, and location parameter µ = 0, following […”
Section: A Time-invariant Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under CSI uncertainty, the Viterbi algorithm implements Algorithm 1 with the loglikelihoods computed using the noisy channel estimate, while ViterbiNet is trained using samples taken from different realizations of the noisy h(γ). [41], underwater acoustic channels [42], and impulsive noise channels [43]. In particular, we simulate an alphastable noise with stability parameter α = 0.5, skewness parameter β = 0.75, scale parameter c = 1, and location parameter µ = 0, following […”
Section: A Time-invariant Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these experiments, we compare the BER and MSE of our methods with those of the conventional DFE and the state-of-the-art algorithms in the literature including: reweighted zero-attracting least mean p-power (RZALMP) [35], improved least sum of exponentials (ILSE) [34], l 0 -RLS [32] (indicated as LZRLS in the figures), as well as the conventional SA, RLS and LMS algorithms. We emphasize that all of these algorithms are designed to combat the impulsive noise through minimization of different cost functions summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in [32] and [33], the authors proposed recursive least squares (RLS)-type robust adaptive estimation and equalization methods, which leverage the sparsity of the underwater channels by adding an l 0 -norm to the cost function. However, the methods in [32] and [33] are not completely adaptive in the sense that they need a few threshold values to be determined in advance, and the values of these thresholds are highly dependent on the transmitted data statistics. In [34], a hyperbolic function, e.g., C (e m ) = cosh(e m ), is used as the cost function to inherently combine different powers of the error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But it would occupy more bandwidth and reduce communication effectiveness, and this would be a deadly drawback for the fact that underwater acoustic channel is badly band-limited due to low-frequency ship noise and absorption of high-frequency energy [2]. It can be concluded that enhancing convergence rate of equalizer is a better option than enlarging the training sequences in underwater acoustic communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%