Robust estimation and inference for heavy tailed GARCH

Abstract

We develop two new estimators for a general class of stationary GARCH models with possibly heavy tailed asymmetrically distributed errors, covering processes with symmetric and asymmetric feedback like GARCH, Asymmetric GARCH, VGARCH and Quadratic GARCH. The first estimator arises from negligibly trimming QML criterion equations according to error extremes. The second imbeds negligibly transformed errors into QML score equations for a Method of Moments estimator. In this case, we exploit a sub-class of redescending transforms that includes tail-trimming and functions popular in the robust estimation literature, and we re-center the transformed errors to minimize small sample bias. The negligible transforms allow both identification of the true parameter and asymptotic normality. We present a consistent estimator of the covariance matrix that permits classic inference without knowledge of the rate of convergence. A simulation study shows both of our estimators trump existing ones for sharpness and approximate normality including QML, Log-LAD, and two types of non-Gaussian QML (Laplace and Power-Law). Finally, we apply the tail-trimmed QML estimator to financial data.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.3150/14-BEJ616 in the Bernoulli (http://isi.cbs.nl/bernoulli/) by the International Statistical Institute/Bernoulli Society (http://isi.cbs.nl/BS/bshome.htm

Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Conditional Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall

“…For the conventional Gaussian quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE), a standard condition to ensure n 1/2 -consistency is the moment condition E(ε 4 t ) < ∞. When the moment condition is suspicious, Assumption 3.1 can still be satisfied by, for example, the estimator of Hill (2015), which is n υ 0 /2consistent with υ 0 as close to 1 as desired.…”

Robust recursive estimation of GARCH models

“…Various methods of non recursive estimation of GARCH parameters and volatility in presence of outliers consist either in (i ) identifying and correcting additive outliers (AO) or innovative outliers (IO) in (residual) time series (see e. g. [9,10,23,24,27,28,34]), or in (ii ) robustifying classical statistical estimators of the type LS or ML to the form of M estimators and similar robust versions (see e. g. [7,33,44,49,55]), or in (iii ) applying estimators with robust properties of the type LAD or median MAD (see e. g. [3,36,39,45,46,58]).…”