2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2343156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Estimation and Inference for Heavy Tailed GARCH

Abstract: We develop two new estimators for a general class of stationary GARCH models with possibly heavy tailed asymmetrically distributed errors, covering processes with symmetric and asymmetric feedback like GARCH, Asymmetric GARCH, VGARCH and Quadratic GARCH. The first estimator arises from negligibly trimming QML criterion equations according to error extremes. The second imbeds negligibly transformed errors into QML score equations for a Method of Moments estimator. In this case, we exploit a sub-class of redesce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our entire statistical inference procedure aforementioned is valid as long as y t is stationary, and hence it can have a wide applicable scope in dealing with the heavy-tailed data. Heavy-tailedness is often observed in many empirical data (see, e.g., Rachev (2003), Hill (2015) and Zhu and Ling (2015)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, our entire statistical inference procedure aforementioned is valid as long as y t is stationary, and hence it can have a wide applicable scope in dealing with the heavy-tailed data. Heavy-tailedness is often observed in many empirical data (see, e.g., Rachev (2003), Hill (2015) and Zhu and Ling (2015)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifications that average across Euler equations introduce nonexistent moments, which cause the GMM criterion to be asymptotically random. Complementary to the tail-trimming explored in Hill (2015) and Hill and Prokhorov (2016), our Monte Carlo experiments show that age cohort GMM, and overidentifying restrictions in general, yield improvements in mean squared error and test size/power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) setting, when error moments become infinite between 2 and 4, the convergence rate of quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) estimation falls below n 1/2 (Berkes and Horváth, 2003), and the asymptotic distribution may be non-Gaussian and difficult to estimate (Hall and Yao, 2003). To address fat-tail issues in the GARCH context, Hill (2015) and Hill and Prokhorov (2016) introduce, respectively, tail-trimmed QML and tail-trimmed GEL, each of which yields asymptotic normality and better finite-sample properties relative to a variety of standard methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) in the first step instead of the QMTTL estimator of Hill (2015). We replaced the standard QML estimator with the QMTTL estimator of Hill (2015) because the aforementioned estimator enjoys improved convergence properties in small samples compared to the standard QML estimator.…”
Section: B Least-squares Estimator Of Univariate Garch(11) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%