2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust evaluation of performance monitoring options for ozone disinfection in water recycling using Bayesian analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend in WW matched that reported for different WWs by Gamage et al (2013) (SI, Figure S5) (Gamage et al, 2013). In previous studies (Carvajal et al, 2017;Gamage et al, 2013;Gerrity et al, 2012), the relationship between UV 254 abatement and the specific ozone dose was described by a power function, and such a function also fits the data reported herein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trend in WW matched that reported for different WWs by Gamage et al (2013) (SI, Figure S5) (Gamage et al, 2013). In previous studies (Carvajal et al, 2017;Gamage et al, 2013;Gerrity et al, 2012), the relationship between UV 254 abatement and the specific ozone dose was described by a power function, and such a function also fits the data reported herein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Detection limits were determined according to the maximal measurable inactivation in each individual experiment. Parameter estimates were assumed to be normally distributed, and prior knowledge of mean values and standard deviations obtained from literature, were included (Carvajal et al, 2017;Gamage et al, 2013). When no prior knowledge was available, a noninformative normal prior or flat prior were used for the mean, and a uniform flat prior for the standard deviation.…”
Section: Experiments With Proxies Experiments With Proxies Experiment...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (2016) applied FCM analysis with fluorescence staining to analyze the membrane damage or DNA damage of bacteria caused under different O 3 /DOC mass ratios, but the effect of • OH on DNA damage at higher O 3 /DOC mass ratios was not studied yet. It should be noted that the online measurements of O 3 and DOC concentrations require expensive instruments, and the consumed O 3 calculated from the differential O 3 concentration between inlet and outlet gas might have a higher value than the true consumed O 3 (Carvajal et al, 2017).…”
Section: ; Vonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with extensive studies focusing on the oxidation performance, few studies have applied the spectroscopic indicator frameworks for estimation of disinfection efficiency. Gerrity et al (2012), Gamage et al (2013) and Carvajal et al (2017) evaluated the ΔUVA254 or ΔTF as indicators for predicting inactivation of seeded or autochthonous E. coli, MS2 Bacteriophage and Bacillus subtilis Spores using cultivation-based methods, respectively. However, the information on the correlations between spectroscopic indicators and inactivation of autochthonous bacterial communities or damage of DNA is not available yet.…”
Section: ; Vonmentioning
confidence: 99%