2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust extended recursive least squares identification algorithm for Hammerstein systems with dynamic disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from the above formulas that the value of the operator changes with the individual's fitness value score. When the individual's fitness value is low, the score will be high according to equation (13), and the value of F G i and CR G i will decrease. When the individual's fitness value is higher than the average, the score is low, and the value of F G i and CR G i will increase accordingly.…”
Section: Parameters Adaption Mutation Operator and Crossovermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from the above formulas that the value of the operator changes with the individual's fitness value score. When the individual's fitness value is low, the score will be high according to equation (13), and the value of F G i and CR G i will decrease. When the individual's fitness value is higher than the average, the score is low, and the value of F G i and CR G i will increase accordingly.…”
Section: Parameters Adaption Mutation Operator and Crossovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the wide application of the Hammerstein model, how to identify accurate mathematical models has become the research direction of many researchers. At present, some methods that can effectively identify the Hammerstein model are proposed, such as the least squares algorithm [13], maximum likelihood algorithm [14,15], etc. ere are also some improved algorithms based on traditional algorithms, such as support vector machines [16,17] and multiinnovative stochastic gradient [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System identification and model parameter estimation are basic in controller design, dynamic systems modeling, and signal processing 1,2 . Different identification methods have been proposed for linear systems and nonlinear systems, such as the least squares methods, 3‐5 the maximum likelihood methods, 6‐8 the gradient methods, 9 the orthogonal matching pursuit methods, 10 and the robust identification methods 11,12 . However, most of these methods assumed that the input–output data are available at every sampling instant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Different identification methods have been proposed for linear systems and nonlinear systems, such as the least squares methods, [3][4][5] the maximum likelihood methods, [6][7][8] the gradient methods, 9 the orthogonal matching pursuit methods, 10 and the robust identification methods. 11,12 However, most of these methods assumed that the input-output data are available at every sampling instant. In other words, the outputs and the inputs have the same sampling rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the research of nonlinear systems has attracted numerous attention 2‐4 . For the Hammerstein nonlinear systems with dynamic disturbances and measurement noise, Dong et al proposed an extended recursive least squares algorithm based on the auxiliary model identification idea 5 . On the parameter estimation of Hammerstein output‐error systems, Li et al presented a maximum likelihood Levenberg‐Marquardt recursive algorithm by making sufficient use of the interval‐varying input‐output data 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%