Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3178876.3186148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Factorization Machines for User Response Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvements over the state-of-the-art methods have been confirmed to be statistically significant according to the test results. Moreover, by examining the two different robust FM variants (RFM-PB by [14] and our RMF method), we found that both methods improve the performance of vanilla FM for most cases, which validates the advantage of endowing FM model with robustness. However, we notice that the RFM-PB by [14] is not always better than CFM for many cases; and by contrast, our RMF is consistently better than CFM.…”
Section: Results Of Recommendation and Classificationsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The improvements over the state-of-the-art methods have been confirmed to be statistically significant according to the test results. Moreover, by examining the two different robust FM variants (RFM-PB by [14] and our RMF method), we found that both methods improve the performance of vanilla FM for most cases, which validates the advantage of endowing FM model with robustness. However, we notice that the RFM-PB by [14] is not always better than CFM for many cases; and by contrast, our RMF is consistently better than CFM.…”
Section: Results Of Recommendation and Classificationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Moreover, by examining the two different robust FM variants (RFM-PB by [14] and our RMF method), we found that both methods improve the performance of vanilla FM for most cases, which validates the advantage of endowing FM model with robustness. However, we notice that the RFM-PB by [14] is not always better than CFM for many cases; and by contrast, our RMF is consistently better than CFM. This encouraging results validate the effectiveness and importance of the proposed doubly capped norms minimization scheme.…”
Section: Results Of Recommendation and Classificationsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The improvements achieved by these models show that explicit interaction between variables is important for advertisement performance prediction, so we adopted explicit interaction in our idea as a conditional attention mechanism. There are several studies on CVR prediction [27,29,39], but there are not as many as the studies on CTR prediction. CVR prediction is difficult, because the number of conversions is imbalanced data that almost ad creative's conversions are zero.…”
Section: Ctr and Conversion Prediction In Display Advertisingmentioning
confidence: 99%