2002
DOI: 10.3182/20020721-6-es-1901.00810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Fault Diagnosis in the Presence of Process Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residuals vector R(t) depending on the inputs as an uncertain system, actuator faults cannot and outputs is obtained as be detected, even if the conditions for perfect or imperfect decoupling [17] are satisfied, because of…”
Section: Of the System Several Methods Have Been Developedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The residuals vector R(t) depending on the inputs as an uncertain system, actuator faults cannot and outputs is obtained as be detected, even if the conditions for perfect or imperfect decoupling [17] are satisfied, because of…”
Section: Of the System Several Methods Have Been Developedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation ( 18) enables the condition for perfect decoupling, m−n>0, to be obtained. For localization of the faults, m−n−1>0 must be guaranteed [17]. H l1…”
Section: The Augmented Uncertainty Vector (14) Has Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the experimental data is typically obtained with the presence of sensors errors and measurement noise, modeling errors, and external disturbances that can impact on the system model accuracy; see, e.g., Reference [ 5 ]. This scenario has been considered for sensor or actuator failure diagnosis and isolation in systems with structural uncertainties and noisy measurements, utilizing residual analysis and Bayesian frameworks to develop failure detection procedures [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%