2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-010-0249-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Fitting of Circle Arcs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that there may be some missing cross sections because they have few or no TLS points due to occlusion problems during the scanning process. The points included in each cross section i, after their 2D projection onto the horizontal plane, are adjusted to a circle using the robust adjustment method proposed by Ladrón de Guevara et al [44]. This method of adjustment is very suitable when outliers are foreseen due to TLS points not belonging to the tree stem (e.g., those located in epiphytic vegetation, nearby branches, or understory vegetation).…”
Section: Automatic Extraction Of Tree Level Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that there may be some missing cross sections because they have few or no TLS points due to occlusion problems during the scanning process. The points included in each cross section i, after their 2D projection onto the horizontal plane, are adjusted to a circle using the robust adjustment method proposed by Ladrón de Guevara et al [44]. This method of adjustment is very suitable when outliers are foreseen due to TLS points not belonging to the tree stem (e.g., those located in epiphytic vegetation, nearby branches, or understory vegetation).…”
Section: Automatic Extraction Of Tree Level Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the derivative of the absolute value function |φ S j | (left-hand side term of (2.8)) is not defined at zero. A more stable alternative to the sign function used here would be based on the left-and right-side partial derivatives as suggested by [38]. The volume preserving term generalizes the commonly used balloon term [12], where the scalar A diff A j − A 0 j determines both the size and the direction (expansion or contraction) of the evolution of φ S j and its respective boundary (zero-level).…”
Section: Level-set-based Shape Morphingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many fields in science and technology are faced with the problem of fitting a surface to a set of 3D data. This problem is also investigated in a variety of 2D cases in which fitting a quadratic surface to a set of data is desired [1][2][3][4][5]. Quadratic surfaces almost fit every set of 3D data [6] which have a wide range of application such as 3D reconstruction [7], pose estimation [8], restricted stereo correspondence problem [9] and object recognition analysis and sensor calibration [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%