2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust fitting of fluorescence spectra for pre-symptomatic wheat leaf rust detection with Support Vector Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, two different supervised classification methods were used for data analysis, the LDA and the non-linear SVM methods. Both classification methods have shown good results for detecting plant diseases at small scale [14,21,67,68] but to our knowledge have not been used previously for the detection of plant diseases at large scale, such as the one of this study. For the whole dataset, LDA reached an overall accuracy of 59.0% and a κ of 0.487 while SVM showed a higher overall accuracy, 79.2%, and a slightly higher κ, 0.495.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, two different supervised classification methods were used for data analysis, the LDA and the non-linear SVM methods. Both classification methods have shown good results for detecting plant diseases at small scale [14,21,67,68] but to our knowledge have not been used previously for the detection of plant diseases at large scale, such as the one of this study. For the whole dataset, LDA reached an overall accuracy of 59.0% and a κ of 0.487 while SVM showed a higher overall accuracy, 79.2%, and a slightly higher κ, 0.495.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Rumpf et al [21] used this approach to discriminate between healthy sugar beet leaves from that infected with various foliar pathogens that included Cercospora beticola, Uromyces beate and Erysiphe betae at early stages of pathogenesis based on hyperspectral data. Similarly, Römer et al [68] detected wheat leaf rust at a pre-symptomatic stage using UV-light induced fluorescence data analysed by SVM classification methods. Nevertheless, in our study, although SVM reached the highest overall accuracy, LDA classified olive trees better at the initial and low VW severity levels with accuracies of 71.4% and 75.0%, respectively, in comparison with the 14.3% and 40.6% obtained by SVM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In using SVMs, an upper bound is minimized by the principle of structural risk minimization (SRM) whereas in using ANNs, traditional empirical risk minimization (ERM) is employed [30]. Recently, SVMs have been applied to estimate soil moisture [31], leaf area index, leaf chlorophyll density [32] and leaf infections [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both regression models aim to predict crop performance traits, the univariate approach only uses a limited set of SRI (Gonzalez-Dugo et al 2015), whereas the multivariate approach utilises the entire spectrum to model plant response (Kipp et al 2014). Some authors show that, in comparison to univariate approaches, multivariate approaches were able to provide better results in detection of early stages of biotic stress (Römer et al 2011), or in the predict nitrogen and water content (Kusnierek and Korsaeth 2015). Another approach, based on radiative transfer models, seems promising for field phenotyping, as this takes into account biochemical and structural properties of the leaf and canopy (Thorp et al 2015).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%