2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2010.536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Gait Recognition Against Speed Variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We set K to 8 in our experiment for parameter pairs. Thus, parameter pairs were set to be (1,2), (2,4), (3,6), (4,8), (5,10), (6,12), (7,14), and (8,16). We tested those parameter pairs and selected parameter pair (2,4) since it performed best in our experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We set K to 8 in our experiment for parameter pairs. Thus, parameter pairs were set to be (1,2), (2,4), (3,6), (4,8), (5,10), (6,12), (7,14), and (8,16). We tested those parameter pairs and selected parameter pair (2,4) since it performed best in our experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose a novel method of identifying humans from their gait under speed variations, where we combine cubic higher-order local auto-correlation (CHLAC) features and a statistical HMM framework [10]. We also employ the concatenation of CHLAC and gait silhouette-based principal component analysis (GaitSilhouette-PCA, or GSP) as features and combine them with HMM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method using silhouette transformation based on walking speed (ST-WS) [36] separates static and dynamic features by fitting a human model and uses a factorization-based transformation model to transform the dynamic features from a reference speed to a target speed. The speed-invariant method in [37] uses the features extracted by Fisher discriminant analysis based cubic high-order local auto-correlation of the gait sequences to train a hidden Markov model. Different approaches have been used to address variations in carrying condition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These model-based approach with dynamical features often led to the concept of model distance that depicts how far two models are [7]. On the contrary, static features usually led to statistical gait metrics which are easily implemented in popular classifiers like HMM, NN or SVM [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%