2017
DOI: 10.1177/1475090217708640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust generalized dynamic inversion based control of autonomous underwater vehicles

Abstract: A novel two-loop structured robust generalized dynamic inversion-based control system is proposed for autonomous underwater vehicles. The outer (position) loop of the generalized dynamic inversion control system utilizes proportional-derivative control of the autonomous underwater vehicle's inertial position errors from the desired inertial position trajectories, and it provides the reference yaw and pitch attitude angle commands to the inner loop. The inner (attitude) loop utilizes generalized dynamic inversi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quadrotors have very simple mechanics since the control of their position is determined by the changes in speed in their motors and they are used when high maneuverability is required, since they are capable of moving in any direction or flying at low speeds. Due to the complexity of the system, different algorithms have been developed to achieve autonomous control in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, using techniques from linear control methodologies with PID [10,11], to nonlinear control techniques 2 of 24 such as Feedback Linearization control, model predictive control, adaptive control approaches [12], fail-safe methodologies based on sliding mode control theory and backstepping control [13,14], combinations such as Adaptive Sliding Backstepping Control [15][16][17], diffuse control in the proposal of Geometric Control [18,19], Nonlinear Dynamic In-version (NDI) Control [20], the Robust Generalized Dynamic Inversion (RGDI) Quadcopter Control System [21] and the Neural Network Control System of UAV Altitude Dynamics [22][23][24][25]; most of these state-of-the-art nonlinear and adaptive control techniques for quadrotors were discussed by Hongwei and Ghulam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quadrotors have very simple mechanics since the control of their position is determined by the changes in speed in their motors and they are used when high maneuverability is required, since they are capable of moving in any direction or flying at low speeds. Due to the complexity of the system, different algorithms have been developed to achieve autonomous control in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, using techniques from linear control methodologies with PID [10,11], to nonlinear control techniques 2 of 24 such as Feedback Linearization control, model predictive control, adaptive control approaches [12], fail-safe methodologies based on sliding mode control theory and backstepping control [13,14], combinations such as Adaptive Sliding Backstepping Control [15][16][17], diffuse control in the proposal of Geometric Control [18,19], Nonlinear Dynamic In-version (NDI) Control [20], the Robust Generalized Dynamic Inversion (RGDI) Quadcopter Control System [21] and the Neural Network Control System of UAV Altitude Dynamics [22][23][24][25]; most of these state-of-the-art nonlinear and adaptive control techniques for quadrotors were discussed by Hongwei and Ghulam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, GDI control avoids the main limitations and shortcomings of NDI in its implementations to control complex and highly-nonlinear aerospace systems, namely the difficulties in controlling under-actuated dynamics and nonholonomicity, the simplifying approximations that are usually needed to invert nonlinear plants, the square dimensionality restriction, singular configurations of square inversion, elimination of useful nonlinearities, and high controls magnitudes. By avoiding these disadvantages, GDI control has been capable to solve challenging aerospace control problems [22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence GDI methodology overcome the limitations associated with classical Nonlinear dynamic inversion control, which includes cancellation of useful nonlinearities, simplifying assumptions required to invert the nonlinear plant dynamics, large control effort and square dimensionality restrictions. GDI control technique had been applied for several aerospace and robotics applications [20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%