2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2011.6083013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust hand-eye self-calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calibration performance is also either equal or superior to current state of the art correspondence based hand-eye calibration methods. The rotational accuracy is in the same order of magnitude or even better when compared to the results published by Seo et al [13] and Ruland et al [11] respectively. The translational accuracy is improved over the contribution of Heller et al [7].…”
Section: Evaluation On Benchmark Datasetsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Calibration performance is also either equal or superior to current state of the art correspondence based hand-eye calibration methods. The rotational accuracy is in the same order of magnitude or even better when compared to the results published by Seo et al [13] and Ruland et al [11] respectively. The translational accuracy is improved over the contribution of Heller et al [7].…”
Section: Evaluation On Benchmark Datasetsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…throughout the expected noise levels. The effect of improving estimations at increasing noise levels (between 0 and 1 × 10 −3 rad) was analyzed by Ruland et al in [11]. The average computation time in these simulated experiments was approximately 107 s.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Noise Affected Interest Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each set consists of full images which are used as input. Besides constraining hypotheses to be on the ground plane known from camera calibration [16], [5], no search space limitation/selection is performed. To classify detections into true and false positives, the standard PASCAL VOC coverage metric [17] is thresholded at a minimum coverage of 50 %.…”
Section: Detection Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strobl and Hirzinger proposed a new adaptive error model that helped improve the solution to AX = XB and AX = ZB [17]. Ruland proposed a self-calibration method that took projection error as its cost function and optimized it using branch-and-bound [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%