2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11063-008-9084-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Handwritten Character Recognition with Features Inspired by Visual Ventral Stream

Abstract: This paper focuses on the applicability of the features inspired by the visual ventral stream for handwritten character recognition. A set of scale and translation invariant C2 features are first extracted from all images in the dataset. Three standard classifiers kNN, ANN and SVM are then trained over a training set and then compared over a separate test set. In order to achieve higher recognition rate, a two stage classifier was designed with different preprocessing in the second stage. Experiments performed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained the best error rate of 4.54% in the resolution of 20脳20 (the same as the best resolution for the NicIcon dataset). Borji et al [6] performed extensive empirical tests on this dataset, testing multiple algorithms, 3-NN, ANN, SVM polynomial , SVM linear and SVM RBF , each with four parameter choices (two choices of filters times two numbers of orientations). Of the twenty reported error rates, the mean was 8.69% and only four combinations beat our approach with a best performance of 2.36%.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained the best error rate of 4.54% in the resolution of 20脳20 (the same as the best resolution for the NicIcon dataset). Borji et al [6] performed extensive empirical tests on this dataset, testing multiple algorithms, 3-NN, ANN, SVM polynomial , SVM linear and SVM RBF , each with four parameter choices (two choices of filters times two numbers of orientations). Of the twenty reported error rates, the mean was 8.69% and only four combinations beat our approach with a best performance of 2.36%.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition rate of 99.52% that we achieve for the MNIST data set is comparable to the best existing approaches 4 . In particular, our method outperforms the shape context approach (99.37% in [4]), and three other approaches (94.20% in [17], 97.62% in [5] and 98.73% in [10]) that use biologically inspired feature detectors combined with a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) [17] and a linear SVM classifier [5,10]. The highest recognition rate achieved to date is 99.73% [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For the Farsi data set, the recognition rate of 99.33% that we achieve is better than the best results ever reported in the literature. The COSFIRE filters outperform other biologically inspired feature detectors (96% in [5] and 99.1% in [10]) combined with a linear SVM classifier and also outperform the modified gradient technique which resulted in a recognition rate of 98.8% when combined with a multiple classifier system based on MLP classifiers [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Borji et al (2008) performed extensive empirical tests on this dataset, testing multiple algorithms, 3-NN, ANN, SVM polynomial , SVM linear and SVM R B F , each with four parameter choices (two choices of filters times two numbers of orientations). Of the twenty reported error rates, the mean was 8.69%, and only four combinations beat our approach, with a best performance of 2.36%.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%