Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3132847.3133096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Heterogeneous Discriminative Analysis for Single Sample Per Person Face Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proposed method we got the percentage recognition rate as 96.01 for the FERET database as compared to the existing techniques presented by Meng Pang et al, [20], Zhijie Tang et al, [21] and Yuqi Pan and Mingyan Jiang [22] as listed in Table 5. Further, for the NIR database the proposed method achieves the percentage recognition rate as 84.5 when compared to the existing method developed by Faten Omri et al [23], who got the recognition rate as 60 percent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the proposed method we got the percentage recognition rate as 96.01 for the FERET database as compared to the existing techniques presented by Meng Pang et al, [20], Zhijie Tang et al, [21] and Yuqi Pan and Mingyan Jiang [22] as listed in Table 5. Further, for the NIR database the proposed method achieves the percentage recognition rate as 84.5 when compared to the existing method developed by Faten Omri et al [23], who got the recognition rate as 60 percent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, Face recognition using the combination of DTCWT and FDCT features in different angular orientations and Euclidean Distance classifier has been proposed [20] 87.25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first, we test the homogeneous FR framework with variations in illumination, and pose. We compared the proposed LFRP with several other state-of-the-art methods, namely G-face [10], W-face [11], LQP [36], ELDP [55], MSLDE [9], SLBFLE [25], DA-JL [48], RSLCR [49], ANI [50], LOGO [51], LGH [65], RHDA [66] and deep learning methods (CNN + Center Loss [38], CNN + Range Loss [39], Deep Face [40], Sphere Face [67], Cos Face [68], and Arc Face [69]). Mostly the original available codes are used to implement the methods, which are mentioned above.…”
Section: Results On Homogeneous Face Recognition Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it undergoes a large reformation from hand-crafted features to automatic deep features. The Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [28]- [31] reveal a huge advantage on feature representations, and therefore they dominate the person Re-ID field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%