2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.13.520333
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust hierarchically organized whole-brain patterns of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders observed after Personalized Intrinsic Network Topography

Abstract: Background: Spatial patterns of brain functional connectivity can vary substantially at the individual level. Applying cortical surface-based approaches with individualized rather than group templates may accelerate the discovery of biological markers related to psychiatric disorders. We investigated cortico-subcortical networks from multi-cohort data in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and healthy controls using individualized connectivity profiles. Methods: We utilized resting state and an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased variability in fALFF in SSD and ASD is a key finding consistent with a growing body of literature noting greater heterogeneity of functional brain activation/connectivity patterns in psychiatric samples [24,36,[64][65][66][67][68][69]. Mean correlational distance quantifies how "typical", or close to the average, one's pattern of brain activity is.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The increased variability in fALFF in SSD and ASD is a key finding consistent with a growing body of literature noting greater heterogeneity of functional brain activation/connectivity patterns in psychiatric samples [24,36,[64][65][66][67][68][69]. Mean correlational distance quantifies how "typical", or close to the average, one's pattern of brain activity is.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Clinical and experimental transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to brain regions exhibits large inter-individual variation in efficacy [1]. Individuals have unique functional connectivity and brain topography patterns [2][3][4] and individualized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approaches and surface-based brain parcellations offer stronger brain-behavior links as compared to standard group-based parcellations [2,5,6]. Further, treatment response to TMS may be influenced by individual differences in functional brain organization and personalized functional targeting may improve outcomes [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical and experimental application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to brain regions is affected by large inter-individual variation in efficacy [1]. Individuals have unique functional connectivity and brain topography patterns [2][3][4] and individualized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approaches and surface-based brain parcellations offer stronger brain-behavior links as compared to standard meta-analytic targets [2,5,6], which is highly relevant for neurostimulation. Recent work has highlighted that findings can also vary widely based on methodological variation in fMRI analyses [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%