2018
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2017.2739109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Impedance Control of Uncertain Mobile Manipulators Using Time-Delay Compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By defining a two-dimensional output vector to decouple robot’s two control signals and using the backstepping methodology, Rudra et al (2016) proposed a dynamic controller for WMRs. In order to design a robust dynamic impedance controller, Souzanchi-K et al (2017) divided the WMR’s model into two parts, namely, a known nominal model and unknown dynamics. To compensate for unmodelled dynamics and modelling imperfection, the adaptive switching gain-based torque control (Roy et al, 2017) has been designed as a dynamic controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By defining a two-dimensional output vector to decouple robot’s two control signals and using the backstepping methodology, Rudra et al (2016) proposed a dynamic controller for WMRs. In order to design a robust dynamic impedance controller, Souzanchi-K et al (2017) divided the WMR’s model into two parts, namely, a known nominal model and unknown dynamics. To compensate for unmodelled dynamics and modelling imperfection, the adaptive switching gain-based torque control (Roy et al, 2017) has been designed as a dynamic controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time delay is common in real systems and often reduces the control system performance and even may lead to the loss of stability. Therefore, the study of robust control of uncertain time-delay systems has been addressed by several papers (Roy et al 2017;Wu 2017;Souzanchi-K et al 2017). However, a common technique for integer-order systems with delay, the so-called Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional method, cannot be extended easily to FO systems, and the control of FO delayed systems is still a challenging problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a common technique for integer-order systems with delay, the so-called Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional method, cannot be extended easily to FO systems, and the control of FO delayed systems is still a challenging problem. Within the scope of this problem several papers (Wei et al 2016(Wei et al , 2017Roy et al 2017;Wu 2017;Souzanchi-K et al 2017; considered only the design of the controller to ensure robust stability. In fact, when designing a controller, not only the stability of the system, but also its performance must be guaranteed (Yu and Chu 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the application of sliding-mode and backstepping methods can be hindered by the need to transform previously the dynamic model of mobile manipulators into canonical or triangular state-space forms. One can also note results on robust and adaptive control schemes for mobile manipulators which aim at compensating for model uncertainty and disturbances in these robotic systems [Xu et al, 2009], [Souzanchi et al, 2017], [Wu et al, 2014], [Park et al, 2018], [Monzur and Kulawik, 2006]. There are also findings on global linearizationbased control schemes for mobile manipulators, as for instance in the case of flatness-based control [Tang et al, 2011], [Morales et al, 2014], [Lévine, 2011], [Fliess and Mounier, 1999], [Sira-Ramirez and Agrawal, 2004], [Villagra et al, 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%