2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1711.03611
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust inference on population indirect causal effects: the generalized front-door criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conveniently, most of the estimators for the NIE available in standard software will be robust to unmeasured confounding of this form VanderWeele, 2013, 2015;Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2013;Imai et al, 2010a;Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser, 2012). For investigators who do not wish to make the no interaction assumption, one may consider instead estimating a different form of indirect effect known as the population intervention indirect effect (PIIE) developed by Fulcher et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conveniently, most of the estimators for the NIE available in standard software will be robust to unmeasured confounding of this form VanderWeele, 2013, 2015;Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2013;Imai et al, 2010a;Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser, 2012). For investigators who do not wish to make the no interaction assumption, one may consider instead estimating a different form of indirect effect known as the population intervention indirect effect (PIIE) developed by Fulcher et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion restriction likely holds in the context of medication-mediated effects, where the exposure is typically disease status, mediator is medication taken for the disease, and outcome is an unintended effect of medication, so that healthy persons are usually excluded from receiving medication for the disease in question. In a separate strand of work,Fulcher et al (2017) propose a new form of indirect effect, the population intervention indirect effect (PIIE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, graphical causal models are currently the only causal inference framework in which it is possible to state a set of causal assumptions and derive from those assumptions a conclusive answer to the question whether, and how, a causal effect of interest is identifiable via covariate adjustment. Covariate adjustment is not complete for identification; other methods like the front-door criterion [6] or docalculus [1] can permit identification even if covariate adjustment is impossible. When multiple options are available, however, adjustment may be an attractive option for effect estimation because its statistical properties are well understood, giving access to useful methodology like robust estimators and confidence intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we provide semiparametric estimators for the average causal effect of a single treatment variable on a single outcome variable in increasingly general scenarios, culminating in semiparametric estimators for any hidden variable causal model of a DAG in which this effect is identifiable. Weight-based estimators for a subclass of models considered in this paper, were studied in (Jung et al, 2020), and to the best of our knowledge, the front-door model (Pearl, 1995) is the only graphical model with unmeasured confounders for which an influence function based estimator has been derived (Fulcher et al, 2017). Other related work includes numerical procedures for approximating the influence function proposed by (Frangakis et al, 2015;Carone et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%