2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust integral feedback control based on interval observer for stabilising parameter‐varying systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is hard to find global solution for the inequality (31), some innovative iterative methods such as linearization, 49 P‐K iterations, 50 and path‐following 51 developed in literature to find local solutions for these problems. Here, inspired by References 33,52, we want to present an iterative approach to solve the inequalities Equations (30) and (31). Let consider K1=K11L1+K1(j)$$ {K}_1={\mathcal{K}}_1^{-1}{\mathcal{L}}_1+{K}_1(j) $$ and K2=K21L2+K2(j)$$ {K}_2={\mathcal{K}}_2^{-1}{\mathcal{L}}_2+{K}_2(j) $$, where K1(j)m×2n$$ {K}_1(j)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times 2n} $$ and K2(j)m×r$$ {K}_2(j)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times r} $$ are the value of these gains with iteration j$$ j $$ and K1m×m$$ {\mathcal{K}}_1\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times m} $$, K2m×m$$ {\mathcal{K}}_2\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times m} $$, L1m×2n$$ {\mathcal{L}}_1\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times 2n} $$, …”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it is hard to find global solution for the inequality (31), some innovative iterative methods such as linearization, 49 P‐K iterations, 50 and path‐following 51 developed in literature to find local solutions for these problems. Here, inspired by References 33,52, we want to present an iterative approach to solve the inequalities Equations (30) and (31). Let consider K1=K11L1+K1(j)$$ {K}_1={\mathcal{K}}_1^{-1}{\mathcal{L}}_1+{K}_1(j) $$ and K2=K21L2+K2(j)$$ {K}_2={\mathcal{K}}_2^{-1}{\mathcal{L}}_2+{K}_2(j) $$, where K1(j)m×2n$$ {K}_1(j)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times 2n} $$ and K2(j)m×r$$ {K}_2(j)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times r} $$ are the value of these gains with iteration j$$ j $$ and K1m×m$$ {\mathcal{K}}_1\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times m} $$, K2m×m$$ {\mathcal{K}}_2\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times m} $$, L1m×2n$$ {\mathcal{L}}_1\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times 2n} $$, …”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking for such gains is very conservative and decreases the feasibility of the matrix inequalities especially when the number of regions increases. This issue is relaxed to some extent in Reference 33 by using PLF approach. Second, even though the outputs of the parameter‐varying system are measurable, to the best of our knowledge, the existing interval‐observer‐based control methods have not used them in their control signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, based on the system internal positive representations, the novel structure of an IO is exploited to both discrete and continuous‐time systems without any changes of coordinates in [10]. Meanwhile, Wang et al [11] developed a gain‐scheduled IO for the linear parameter‐varying systems with polytope uncertainty, and in the framework of the IOs, the robust integral feedback stabilising controller is proposed for the parameter‐varying systems in [12]. Besides, an IO is constructed in [13] using the D‐similar transformation proposed in the earlier works of Zhu and Johnson [14] for time‐varying systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%