Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative R
DOI: 10.1109/iros.1995.525811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust jump impact controller for manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inequality in (49) along with (21) and (48) can be used to conclude that as the manipulator approaches the mass, e f (t) will eventually be upper bounded as follows:…”
Section: Case 1: Noncontactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inequality in (49) along with (21) and (48) can be used to conclude that as the manipulator approaches the mass, e f (t) will eventually be upper bounded as follows:…”
Section: Case 1: Noncontactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After completing the square in the bracketed terms, (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) can be expressed aṡ…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walker and Gertz et al exploited kinematic redundancy of the manipulator to reduce the impact force in [19]- [21]. By modeling the impact dynamics as a state dependent jump linear system, Chiu and Lee were able to apply a modified stochastic maximum principle for state dependent jump linear systems to optimize the approach velocity, the force transient during impact and the steady state force error after contact is established [22]. A two degree-of-freedom (DOF) planar manipulator was globally asymptotically regulated to contact an infinitely rigid and massive surface by Tornambe [23] where the impact force was estimated using a reducedorder observer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, such a kind of problem is faced in the case of mechanical systems, such as industrial robots and numerical machines, that have to execute repetitive commands or when disturbances depending on the frequency of the power supply have to be rejected [1]; in the design of high-precision tracking control systems for digital video disk players [2]; in the precise speed control for ultrasonic motors [3]; and when dealing with high-accuracy magnet power supply for proton synchrotron [4]. This type of control is usually referred to as repetitive control, a name first adopted by Hara et al [1], who have studied a controller incorporating a pure delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%