2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust knockdown factors for the design of axially loaded cylindrical and conical composite shells – Development and Validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Definisane preporuke date su u formi krivih koje pokazuju zavisnost redukcionog faktora i odnosa poluprečnika ljuske i debljine (R/t). Na slici 10 prikazane su preporuke za redukcioni faktor prema NASA SP-8007 [14], modifikovane krive u zavisnosti od odnosa dužine i poluprečnika ljuske TH -L/R=5 prema Wagner-u [18], eksperimentalni rezultati prema Flügge-u i rezultati sopstvene numeričke analize. Modifikovana kriva TH -L/R=5 prema Wagner-u [18] obuhvatila je zajednički uticaj imperfekcija u opterećenju i geometrijskih imperfekcija (SBPAsingle boundary perturbation approach), i za odnos dužine i poluprečnika ljuske L/R=5 definiše značajno niže vrednosti redukcionog faktora (KDF) od preporuka datih u NASA SP-8007 [14].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Obtained Results With Design Recommendatiounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Definisane preporuke date su u formi krivih koje pokazuju zavisnost redukcionog faktora i odnosa poluprečnika ljuske i debljine (R/t). Na slici 10 prikazane su preporuke za redukcioni faktor prema NASA SP-8007 [14], modifikovane krive u zavisnosti od odnosa dužine i poluprečnika ljuske TH -L/R=5 prema Wagner-u [18], eksperimentalni rezultati prema Flügge-u i rezultati sopstvene numeričke analize. Modifikovana kriva TH -L/R=5 prema Wagner-u [18] obuhvatila je zajednički uticaj imperfekcija u opterećenju i geometrijskih imperfekcija (SBPAsingle boundary perturbation approach), i za odnos dužine i poluprečnika ljuske L/R=5 definiše značajno niže vrednosti redukcionog faktora (KDF) od preporuka datih u NASA SP-8007 [14].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Obtained Results With Design Recommendatiounclassified
“…Na slici 10 prikazane su preporuke za redukcioni faktor prema NASA SP-8007 [14], modifikovane krive u zavisnosti od odnosa dužine i poluprečnika ljuske TH -L/R=5 prema Wagner-u [18], eksperimentalni rezultati prema Flügge-u i rezultati sopstvene numeričke analize. Modifikovana kriva TH -L/R=5 prema Wagner-u [18] obuhvatila je zajednički uticaj imperfekcija u opterećenju i geometrijskih imperfekcija (SBPAsingle boundary perturbation approach), i za odnos dužine i poluprečnika ljuske L/R=5 definiše značajno niže vrednosti redukcionog faktora (KDF) od preporuka datih u NASA SP-8007 [14]. Figure 10 shows comparisons of numerical analysis results for a cylindrical shell of 10,0 mm thick of carbon and stainless steel given in Figure 5 (with geometric imperfections from 1,0 mm to 10,0 mm), with the currently developed empirical recommendations for the knockdown factor (KDF).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Obtained Results With Design Recommendatiounclassified
“…High quality shells may not suffer from snap-through buckling and a method which allows the quantification of the pre-snap-through imperfection sensitivity was developed by Wagner et al [20]. The single-perturbation displacement approach (SDPA) [50] relies on displacement controlled indentations to approximate the limit load for snap-through buckling as shown in Fig. 5 (middle left).…”
Section: Stacking Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can also be used to study the imperfection sensitivity of composite shells which was shown extensively in [49]. Studies in [50] show that the SBPA delivers robust (conservative with respect to experimental results) lower-bounds for composite shells which lead to a new design load bound for thin-walled composite cylinders which is given by equation (1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imperfection sensitivity exhibited by cylindrical shells renders particular emphasis on their design against instability in axial compression. Therefore, robust design approaches are being developed and validated, such as single perturbation load, single perturbation displacement, single boundary perturbation approaches, and their modifications (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]) in order to replace the existing overconservative design guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%