2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust linear static panel data models usingε-contamination

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative strategy is to use a random effect to address this shortcoming, where s i is used to account for the random factors. Unfortunately, the approach has the disadvantage [32,[34][35][36] of assuming that:…”
Section: Econometric Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The alternative strategy is to use a random effect to address this shortcoming, where s i is used to account for the random factors. Unfortunately, the approach has the disadvantage [32,[34][35][36] of assuming that:…”
Section: Econometric Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it was imperative to assess our results against other specifications. To validate the results, the Hausman-Taylor statistical procedure for correcting endogeneity, which is widely used in empirical research [36,37,41], was implemented; the results are presented in Table 5. Table 5 reports the transitory and persistent effects of ICT on the environment in Africa using the Hausman-Taylor correction.…”
Section: Addressing Potential Problem Of Endogeneity and Cross-panel Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that this study estimates a micro panel, that is, large N (15) and small T (10). Given the nature of the panel, issues surrounding panel unit root tests and panel cointegration do not come into play (Baltagi, Bresson, Chaturvedi, & Lacroix, 2018)therefore, no unit root and cointegration tests were conducted; however, the following diagnostic tests were run.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalfin and McCrary (2017) for a recent survey). Many empirical analyses have used panel data either at the state (Cornwell and Trumbull, 1994;Baltagi, 2006;Baltagi et al, 2018) or at the individual level (Bhuller et al, 2019). The vast majority of the published papers focus on the situation in the U.S.…”
Section: An Application To Crime Recidivism In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%