Proceedings of ICC/SUPERCOMM'94 - 1994 International Conference on Communications
DOI: 10.1109/icc.1994.368840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust low bit-rate video transmission over wireless access systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, wireless links normally require link-layer error recovery (such as 802.2 LLC) and MAC-level error recovery in subnetwork. There are two basic categories of error recovery schemes: ARQ (Automatic Repeat reQuest) [19,[21][22][27][28] and FEC (Forward Error Correction) [20,40]. Which are described in the following subsection.…”
Section: Error Control Based Enhancement Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, wireless links normally require link-layer error recovery (such as 802.2 LLC) and MAC-level error recovery in subnetwork. There are two basic categories of error recovery schemes: ARQ (Automatic Repeat reQuest) [19,[21][22][27][28] and FEC (Forward Error Correction) [20,40]. Which are described in the following subsection.…”
Section: Error Control Based Enhancement Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is waiting, the sender is unable to send another packet. In fact, the current MAC mechanism of IEEE 802.11 WLAN uses this error control mechanism because it is more efficient and simpler than FEC [28,1]. [21] Unlike SW-ARQ, when using SR-ARQ, packets are transmitted continuously by the Data Link Control (DLC) layer.…”
Section: Automatic Repeat Request (Arq)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of video codecs have been proposed in the excellent special issues edited by Tzou et al [157], Hubing [158], and Girod et al [159] for a range of bit rates and applications, but the individual contributions by a number of renowned authors are too numerous to review. Khansari et al [166] as well as Pelz [180] reported promising results on adopting the H.261 codec for wireless applications by invoking powerful signal-processing and error-control techniques in order to remedy the inherent source-coding problems due to stretching its application domain to hostile wireless environments. Färber et al [167]- [170] also contributed substantially toward advancing the state of the art in the context of the H.263 codec as well as in motion compensation [168], [169], as did Eryurtlu, Sadka, and Kondoz [174]- [175].…”
Section: A Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the MPEG4 working group's activities also target mobile videophony [169] and work is under way toward defining a so-called mobile extension to the H.263 codec, to date, there are no approved video coding standards for mobile videophony over existing or future standard radio systems. Khansari et al [130] as well as Pelz [163] reported promising results on adopting the H.261 codec for wireless applications by invoking powerful signal-processing and error-control techniques in order to mitigate the error sensitivity problems due to stretching the application domain of these vulnerable run-length compressed schemes to hostile wireless environments.…”
Section: A Advances In Low-rate Video Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the H.263 codec was detailed in [27], [53], and [175], while a number of transmission schemes designed for accommodating its rather error-sensitive bit stream were proposed, e.g., by the prestigious video communications groups led by Girod at Stanford University, Kondoz at Surrey University, Bull at Bristol University, and others, e.g., in [130]- [147]. As an illustrative example, in Table 5, we summarized the various video resolutions supported by the H.261 and H.263 ITU codecs in order to demonstrate their flexibility [27].…”
Section: B Video Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%