Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2370216.2370281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust, low cost indoor positioning using magnetic resonant coupling

Abstract: We describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of an indoor positioning system based on resonant magnetic coupling. The system has an accuracy of less than 1 m 2 and, because of the underlying physical principle, is robust with respect to disturbances such as people moving around or changes in room configuration. It consists of 16x16x16 cm transmitter coils, each able to cover an area of up to 50 m 2 , and provides location information to an arbitrary number of mobile receivers with an update rate of u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, indoor GPS is very expensive, and its measurements need line of sight, which makes it less practical in difficult indoor construction environments. In addition to the above popular indoor positioning sensors, the 2.4 GHz phase offset technique [15], modulated magnetic signals [16], 24-GHz radar [17], light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [18], and foot-mounted IMU [19] are proposed for the purpose. These systems participated in the Microsoft Indoor Localization Competition [20] in 2017, which judged that only LiDAR and UWB-based systems could achieve better than metre-level positioning accuracy; the LiDAR-based system can achieve centimetre-level positioning accuracy, and the UWB-based system can achieve decimetre-level positioning accuracy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, indoor GPS is very expensive, and its measurements need line of sight, which makes it less practical in difficult indoor construction environments. In addition to the above popular indoor positioning sensors, the 2.4 GHz phase offset technique [15], modulated magnetic signals [16], 24-GHz radar [17], light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [18], and foot-mounted IMU [19] are proposed for the purpose. These systems participated in the Microsoft Indoor Localization Competition [20] in 2017, which judged that only LiDAR and UWB-based systems could achieve better than metre-level positioning accuracy; the LiDAR-based system can achieve centimetre-level positioning accuracy, and the UWB-based system can achieve decimetre-level positioning accuracy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI 3-D position and orientation estimation using triaxial coils was first proposed by Raab et al in their pioneering paper [41]. For more details on MI-based position and orientation estimation, see also [11], [12], [14], [42], and [43]. Our previous work [11] focused on MI indoor localization with additional inertial sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indoor positioning has been a very active area of research in ubiquitous and pervasive computing. Much effort has been spent on developing indoor localization technologies: from the original Cricket system [25] that used both radio and ultrasonic signals, to more recent systems using power lines [23], Ultra-Wide Band signals [1], digital cameras and SLAMs [18], CDMA mobile phone fingerprinting [28], resonant magnetic coupling [24], etc.…”
Section: Typical Mobility and Interaction Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%