2019
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2017.2775862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Measurement Placement for Distribution System State Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimizing the location of metering instruments in distribution systems is a significant subject for research, given the size of the system and potentially limited financial resources [69]. Different objectives have been proposed in the literature to address this problem, including improving system observability, minimizing installation/maintenance costs, bad data detection capability, and improving the DSSE accuracy [ [80]. Different algorithms have been tried for solving the placement problem, including Genetic-Algorithm (GA), Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP), Mixed Integer Semi-Definite Programming (MISDP), and Multi-Objective Evolutionary (MOE) methods.…”
Section: Distribution Network Metering System Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing the location of metering instruments in distribution systems is a significant subject for research, given the size of the system and potentially limited financial resources [69]. Different objectives have been proposed in the literature to address this problem, including improving system observability, minimizing installation/maintenance costs, bad data detection capability, and improving the DSSE accuracy [ [80]. Different algorithms have been tried for solving the placement problem, including Genetic-Algorithm (GA), Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP), Mixed Integer Semi-Definite Programming (MISDP), and Multi-Objective Evolutionary (MOE) methods.…”
Section: Distribution Network Metering System Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution, though, is still uncomfortable, as it involves converting parameter to a variable dependent on the square of the tap ratio (if k = m), or on the tap ratio (if k≠m). This increases the non-linearity degree of the ORPF model, making some rigid power factor limit -e q (14) elastic power factor limit -e q (15) distance is minimized in eq (16) Figure 7. Modeled capability curved for a RES generator.…”
Section: Modeling the Oltc Transformermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is the case, the results show that Local Control requires a careful tuning of its defining parameters, as it is prone to produce violations under peculiar operating conditions of the DN. The authors studied various optimal tuning solutions for Local Control laws in [15,56]; these approaches are promising, but in the absence of proper network monitoring, they depend heavily on the statistical estimation of generation/demand profiles, which may not ensure a strong correlation with the actual operating conditions of the grid. On the other hand, if the DN's control and supervision architecture allows the implementation of Coordinated Control, then Local Control could either be abandoned or, in correspondence with the regulatory framework, could work in tandem with Local Control; the base operation could be provided by Local Control (with a less stiff set-up), which, in spite of the disadvantages, tries to keep the voltage profile close to nominal, while the Coordinated Control would override the Local Control in cases of detected violations.…”
Section: Local Vs Coordinated Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, several works can be found in the literature approaching the problem of determining the best MP configuration for a given power network. The problem has been addressed in literature, proposing different specific targets including system observability, installation/maintenance cost minimization, poor data detection capability, and SE accuracy [8][9][10][11]. To solve the issue, different optimization algorithms have been proposed, such as genetic algorithms (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) or heuristic techniques.…”
Section: Meter Placement Techniques and Measurement Systems For Distrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, SE techniques make use of few actual measurements of medium-voltage (MV) branch voltages or current/power flows for collecting the input data of SE algorithms. The determination of the best possible combination of meters for distribution system monitoring is referred to as the optimal meter placement (MP) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. For the measurement of the SE input data, different kinds of measurement equipment can be used, i.e., phasor measurement units (PMUs), smart meters (SMs), power quality analyzers (PQAs) and so on, with different accuracy features and costs [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%