“…In particular, at 298 K and 109 kPa, the C 2 H 2 /CO 2 (1/1, v/v) adsorption selectivities were predicted to be 4.66, 3.82, and 2.78 for ZJNU-132 , ZJNU-131 , and ZJNU-130 , respectively. The selectivity value of ZJNU-132 is lower than that of the several top-performing MOFs such as NCU-100 (1787), UTSA-300 (743), and CPL-1-NH 2 (119), but higher than that of some literature compounds such as FJU-90 (4.3), CAU-10-H (4.0), FUT-1 (4.0), [Ni(NH 2 -BPTC) 0.5 ] (3.5), NUM-11 (3.0), JXNU-14 (2.97), UPC-200(Fe)-F-BIM (2.94), SNNU-27-Fe (2.0), and [Ca(dtztp) 0.5 ] (1.7) . Considering that the adsorption selectivity and uptake capacity jointly dictated the separation efficiency, Krishna proposed a new index for direct comparison of the separation performance, which was termed the separation potential Δ q taking the above two metrics into account .…”