2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Method for Removing Dynamic Objects from Point Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these methods consume a lot of memory and computing resources. Even if the latest method [5] uses deep-learning and GPU acceleration, it can only maintain a maximum octree depth of 16 and voxel size of 0.3 meters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, these methods consume a lot of memory and computing resources. Even if the latest method [5] uses deep-learning and GPU acceleration, it can only maintain a maximum octree depth of 16 and voxel size of 0.3 meters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous approaches based on the static environment assumption will fail. Moreover, it is also challenging to extract road markers, traffic signs, and other critical static features in the point cloud map, as ghost tracks of moving objects may occlude them [5]. Therefore, it is essential to improve the performance of SLAM in dynamic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coneshaped used by Pomerleau et al [22]. Recently, Pagad et al [20] propose an occupancy map-based method to remove dynamic points in LiDAR scans. They first build occupancy maps using object detection and then use the voxel traversal method to remove the moving objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, because scan data presents a snapshot of the surroundings, scan data in urban environments inevitably includes representations of dynamic objects, such as vehicles, pedestrians, and so forth [13]- [16]. Moreover, because a 3D point cloud map is the product of sequential accumulations of the scan data, there might be traces of dynamic objects, or the ghost trail effect [8], [13], as shown in Fig. 1 on the left.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupancy grid [17] and Octomap [12] are typical methods that use ray tracing, which count hits and misses of scans in the gridmap space and decide the occupancy of the space. By extension, Schauer and Nüchter [14] proposed the removal of dynamic points by traversing a voxel occupancy grid and Pagad et al [13] suggested a combinination of object detection and Octomap. However, ray tracing-based methods are computationally expensive, which led to the introduction of visibility-based methods to reduce the computational cost [8], [10], [15].…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%